Another try at Python's selfishness

[n.estner at gmx.de]

> Still see no problem.  Of course, it goes without saying that
> Python 2.4 doesn't work this way, but given that it's theoretically
> possible for f(a) to be resolved similarly to a.f, then I really
> do not see what you're seeing here.  The kwargs parameter appears
> irrelevant from where I'm sitting.

Then either you didn't understand my answers, or I didn't understand
your idea. Could you summarize how exactly "f(x,y=z)" should be
resolved, i.e. where it should look for "f"?