Local variables initialization
Michal Kwiatkowski
ruby at no.spam
Sun Feb 26 20:49:06 EST 2006
Alex Martelli wrote:
> But of course, then the method's body would have to use _.one rather
> than var_one, _.two rather than var_two, and _.empty_list rather than
> empty_list (what a strange name -- does it STAY empty throughout the
> method's execution?!). To me this looks like a small price to pay, and
empty_list name was chosen only for sake of an example.
> the 'def method(_, self, ...)' signature a clear, strong indication that
> something weird, but not TOO weird, is going on. YMMV...
Thanks for your reply, I'll consider your suggestion.
mk
--
. o . >> http://joker.linuxstuff.pl <<
. . o It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong
o o o than forgiveness for being right.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list