Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)

Farel c_shyone at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 17 11:08:48 EST 2006

Previous message (by thread): Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Next message (by thread): Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Well, I could, but I was looking for answers from persons more
experienced in the ways of Python then myself....

Previous message (by thread): Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Next message (by thread): Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-list mailing list