merits of Lisp vs Python

[André Thieme]

mystilleef schrieb:
> Ken Tilton wrote:
>> Lisp has all the cool qualities you like in your pets, plus native
>> compilation in most implementations, plus maturity and a standard, plus
>> a better OO, plus macros, plus a dozen more small wins. Including
>> automatic indentation. :)
>>
> 
> Better OO? You mean the one that doesn't support basic encapsulation
> and is retardedly cumbersome to use? There's a reason I said, I'd never
> use Lisp for OO not even when I'm high. Gimme Python, Eiffel or
> Smalltalk anyday, not the retarded add-on package bolted on CL.

What do you mean with "encapsulation" in this context?
I am looking for something that Pythons or Smalltalks OO system have
which isn't in Lisps...


André
--