len() and PEP 3000

Bjoern Schliessmann usenet-mail-0306.20.chr0n0ss at spamgourmet.com
Sun Dec 10 06:18:06 EST 2006


Klaas wrote:

> We can think of arbitrarily-stupid ways of changing the perfectly
> functional len(), but since it isn't going to change, why not drop
> this topic?

Don't read my mind again! ;)

Regards,


Björn

-- 
BOFH excuse #83:

Support staff hung over, send aspirin and come back LATER.




More information about the Python-list mailing list