cleaner way to write this try/except statement?
Simon Forman
rogue_pedro at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 1 20:23:11 EDT 2006
Boris Borcic wrote:
> John Salerno wrote:
> > The code to look at is the try statement in the NumbersValidator class,
> > just a few lines down. Is this a clean way to write it? i.e. is it okay
> > to have all those return statements? Is this a good use of try? Etc.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > import wx
> >
> >
> > class NumbersValidator(wx.PyValidator):
> >
> > def __init__(self):
> > wx.PyValidator.__init__(self)
> >
> > def Clone(self):
> > return NumbersValidator()
> >
> > def Validate(self, parent):
> > text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
> > text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
> >
> > try:
> > if not text or int(text) <= 0:
> > wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time
> > entered', wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
> > return False
> > else:
> > return True
> > except ValueError, error:
> > wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
> > wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
> > return False
>
> well, assuming you are unsatisfied with the above, you could try to assert the
> validation condition and catch together all failures, eg :
>
> def Validate(self, parent):
> text_ctrl = self.GetWindow()
> text = text_ctrl.GetValue()
> try :
> assert int(text)>0
> return True
> except (ValueError,AssertionError) :
> wx.MessageBox('Enter a valid time.', 'Invalid time entered',
> wx.OK | wx.ICON_ERROR)
> return False
>
> hth, BB
Assertion statements "go away" when you run python with the '-O' or
'-OO' options. They're only meant for debugging and shouldn't be used
as part of your actual program logic.
You run the risk of introducing hard-to-find bugs if you use them like
this and somebody, somewhere, sometime runs your code in "optimized"
mode.
Peace,
~Simon
More information about the Python-list
mailing list