Python and STL efficiency
Ray
ray_usenet at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 22 22:37:43 EDT 2006
could.net at gmail.com wrote:
> That's to say,
> python is still much faster?
Not really, see my test, in my other post in the same thread. I'm using
VC++ Express 2005. If we're comparing with Python 2.5 I think it's just
fair that for C++ we're using the latest as well.
> I am a c++ newbie but I think c++ should be faster here.
Same here, although that said Python's implementation of those data
structure must already be as optimal as mortals can do it.
<snip>
More information about the Python-list
mailing list