Something for PyPy developers?
Cameron Laird
claird at lairds.us
Sat Aug 5 19:01:57 EDT 2006
In article <1154809334.734417.314660 at i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Paddy <paddy3118 at netscape.net> wrote:
>I just found this:
> http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~dpw/popl/06/Tim-POPL.ppt
>And thought of you... :-)
>
>called "The Next Mainstream Programming Languages", Tim Sweeney of Epic
>Games presents on problems that game writers see and muses on possible
>solutions.
.
.
.
1. I liked this presentation more than I expected.
I suspect my mistake is not to recognize
adequately that POPL *does* have high standards.
2. To me, the closest existing models are Erlang
and, of course, Lisp-the-universal-solution.
3. I remember a couple of earlier waves of effort
in parallelism-savvy languages. Maybe this
time we'll get it right. Stranger things have
happened than for a Parallel Python to emerge.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list