Standalone Python functions in UML?

[Nicola Musatti]

bruno at modulix wrote:
[...]
> Yes, there's in UML a fundamental distinction between classes and
> objects - distinction that does not exist in a lot of OO languages. This
> greatly limits UML's usability for some common idioms in dynamic OOPL's.
> Seems like UML has been designed to express only the restricted subset
> of OO supported by rigid static languages like C++, Java and ADA.

Moreover, it also seems like UML has been designed to express the
restricted OO subset of the paradigms supported by languages like C++
and ADA.

And I suspect UML design tools are not that popular within the C and
Lisp programming communities...

Cheers,
Nicola Musatti