PEP 350: Codetags

[Paul Rubin]

Terry Hancock <hancock at anansispaceworks.com> writes:
> But that's precisely why it would be valuable to have a PEP -- a
> central catalog of such conventions makes it possible for checking
> software to be consistent.  If PyChecker were going to check for such
> things, it would do so only because a standard convention had been
> established.

I'm saying such a PEP should not be approved unless there's already an
implementation (e.g. PyChecker patch).  If the PEP is then approved,
the patch should be merged into the official PyChecker source.