Microsoft Hatred FAQ

[Paul Rubin]

"David Schwartz" <davids at webmaster.com> writes:
>     But there is no law against that type of conduct, *unless* you are a 
> monopolist. So your conclusion hinges on the determination that Microsoft 
> had a monopoly, and that hinges on the definition of the "market". That's a 
> different can of worms for a different part of this thread.

The trial court determined and two different appeals courts upheld
that MS had an illegal monopoly.  I think they have more experience
and knowledge of these things than you do.  MS's illegal monopoly
is an established legal fact regardless of your irrelevant opinion.