Microsoft Hatred FAQ

[David Schwartz]

Paul Rubin wrote:

> "David Schwartz" <davids at webmaster.com> writes:

>>> Of course it's legal for non-monopoly companies.  You seem to think
>>> Microsoft's illegal monopoly is an irrelevant detail.  It is not.

>>     What is an "illegal monopoly"?
>
 It's what Microsoft still stands convicted of having.
>
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/msdoj/

    I don't see anything there about what an "illegal monopoly" is or might 
be. Perhaps you could clarify. What do you think you mean when you say 
"illegal monopoly"?

    DS