What about letting x.( ... ? ... ) be equivalent to ( ... x ... )

[al]

> It seems to me that what you proposed was a "solution", that seems 
> obvious only to you, to a problem perceived only by you.
> 
> I am afraid you would have to work rather harder to persuade me that 
> there is a problem, let alone that you have found the solution to it.

Hello, I never said there is a problem, since you can do whithout it. I 
just said that in some cases, it's better and cleaner to do it in 
another way, and also that this solution is a complement : it does not 
replace or break nothing.

Regards,
Al