defining the behavior of zip(it, it) (WAS: Converting a flat list...)

[Fredrik Lundh]

bonono at gmail.com wrote:

> > maybe it's time to change "equivalent to" to "similar to", to avoid
> > messing things up for people who reads the mostly informal library
> > reference as if it were an ISO specification.
>
> That is their fault as the library reference is supposed to be "(keep
> this under your pillow)", not for reading.

you haven't made much sense in your most recent posts.  why not
just give it up, and leave the design issues to people who don't re-
ply "I don't know" to every question.

</F>