What are OOP's Jargons and Complexities?

[Tassilo v. Parseval]

Also sprach alex goldman:

> Tassilo v. Parseval wrote:

>> Most often, languages with strong typing can be found on the functional
>> front (such as ML and Haskell). These languages have a dynamic typing
>> system. 
>
> No, ML & Haskell are strongly and statically typed. Read this paper if
> interested:

You're right, their type system is in fact static. To me they never had
a very static feel though which is why I get their classification wrong
most of the time. LISP would have been an example for strongly and
dynamically typed.

Tassilo
-- 
use bigint;
$n=71423350343770280161397026330337371139054411854220053437565440;
$m=-8,;;$_=$n&(0xff)<<$m,,$_>>=$m,,print+chr,,while(($m+=8)<=200);