Which is easier? Translating from C++ or from Java...
Patrick Useldinger
pu.news.001 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 11:02:40 EST 2005
woodsman at gmail.com wrote:
> Patrick Useldinger wrote:
>>Depends on what language you know best. But Java is certainly easier
>
> to
>
>>read than C++.
>
>
> There's certainly some irony in those last two sentences. However, I
> agree with the former. It depends on which you know better, the style
> of those who developed each and so forth. Personally, I'd prefer C++.
>
Not really.
If you know none of the languages perfectly, you are less likely to miss
something in Java than in C++ (i.e. no &, * and stuff in Java).
However, if you are much more familiar with one of the two, you're less
likely to miss things there.
-pu
More information about the Python-list
mailing list