super with only one argument

[John Roth]

"Michele Simionato" <michele.simionato at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1110824920.833833.164930 at o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>I asked myself the same question and I am not convinced
> that using 'super' with one argument really makes sense
> (i.e. IMO it is more a liability than an asset). BTW, I have a set
> of notes on the tricky aspects of 'super' you may be interested in.
>
>            Michele Simionato

Wouldn't you use it to access the overridden version
of a static method?

John Roth
>