Anonymus functions revisited

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Ron a écrit :
> On 21 Mar 2005 22:37:42 -0800, "Kay Schluehr" <kay.schluehr at gmx.net>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Mappings like that:
>>
>>  ((x,y),z)   -> x+y-z
>>
>>  ((x,y=0),z) -> None
>>
>>should be valid actions too.
>>
>>What is the audience thinking about that?
> 
> 
> I think that there's too much implied,  and that in the long run it,
> if we keep addding in special shortcuts, it will lead to very dificult
> to read code.  
> 
Don't like Perl ?-)

The problem here is that Kay's proposition mixes two points: flexible 
tuple unpacking and a new syntax for anonymous functions.