Modules for inclusion in standard library?

[Robert Kern]

Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> at the moment python-dev is discussing including Jason Orendorff's path module
> into the standard library.
> 
> Do you have any other good and valued Python modules that you would think are
> bug-free, mature (that includes a long release distance) and useful enough to
> be granted a place in the stdlib?

I would like to see the setuptools/PythonEggs/EasyInstall trifecta get 
more attention and eyeballs. Once it is mature, I think that it will 
obviate the desire for stdlibification of most of the packages being 
requested here.

-- 
Robert Kern
rkern at ucsd.edu

"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
  Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
   -- Richard Harter