map vs. list-comprehension
Tom Anderson
twic at urchin.earth.li
Sat Jul 2 10:15:25 EDT 2005
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
> Tom Anderson <twic at urchin.earth.li> wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Roy Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Even some of the relatively recent library enhancements have been kind
>>> of complicated. The logging module, for example, seems way over the
>>> top.
>>
>> Exactly the same thing happened with Java.
>
> I was under the impression that Python's logging module (like unittest)
> was based on a common Java one, and it's complexity could be blamed on
> that.
That would explain it. Who was responsible for this crime? I say we shoot
them and burn the bodies.
>> if you look at the libraries that were in 1.1, they're very clean and
>> simple (perhaps with the exception of AWT). 1.2 added a load of stuff
>> that was much less well-designed (with the notable exception of the
>> collections stuff, which is beautiful)
>
> There are very many adjectives I could (and have) used to describe the
> Collection framework. "Beautiful" is not among them. I think the closest
> I could manage is "baroque".
Oh, i don't think it's really that bad. For java.
tom
--
REMOVE AND DESTROY
More information about the Python-list
mailing list