Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python

[Nick Coghlan]

Tim Peters wrote:
> LIke it or not, it doesn't seem as strained as trying to pile more
> gimmicks on Python expressions.

Some of us are piling gimmicks on statements, not expressions :)

And I'm looking for out-of-order code execution as well as local namespaces, so 
the let/in syntax wouldn't help much. (The out-of-order execution is what really 
makes the property definition example pretty, IMO)

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at email.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net