python without OO

[Jeff Shannon]

Davor wrote:

> so you get a nice program with separate data structures and functions 
> that operate on these data structures, with modules as containers for 
> both (again ideally separated). Very simple to do and maintain [...]

Replace "modules" with "classes" in the above quote, and you have the 
very essence of object-oriented programming.

(What you describe here *is* object-oriented programming, you're just 
trying to avoid the 'class' statement and use module-objects where 
'traditional' OO would use class instances.)

Jeff Shannon
Technician/Programmer
Credit International