python without OO

[Michael Spencer]

Davor wrote:
> Thanks,
> 
> I do not hate OO - I just do not need it for the project size I'm
> dealing with - and the project will eventually become open-source and
> have additional developers - so I would prefer that we all stick to
> "simple procedural" stuff rather than having to deal with a developer
> that will be convincing me that his 50 layers inheritance hierarchy is
> good since it exists in some weird pattern that he saw somewhere on
> some Java design patterns discussion board :-) and other "proper" OO
> design issues...  Once I opted for C++ in a very small project and
> believed everyone will stick with C subset + better type checking
> offered through C++ - but I simply could not manage to keep them off
> using OO stuff which was just making program more complicated than it
> should have been. (note, I am not an experienced developer, nor the
> others I'll be working with (even though some think they are:-)), so I
> prefer preemptively dealing with issue of everyone showing off their OO
> design skills)
> 
> Davor
> 
Perhaps pylint (http://www.logilab.org/projects/pylint) or its ilk can help you 
enforce a coding style

Michael