Jargons of Info Tech industry
John Bokma
john at castleamber.com
Fri Aug 26 07:21:32 EDT 2005
Denis Kasak <denis.kasak at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike Schilling wrote:
>>
>> Threaded mail-readers too, screen-based editors , spell-checkers, all
>> useless frills.
>
> Interestingly enough, I have explained my opinion in the part of the
> post you have trimmed. On the other hand, things you mentioned are far
> from being useless. They introduce no intrinsical slowdown due to
> increased bandwidth consumation, nor potential security problems.
You can't be sure: errors in the handling of threads can cause a buffer
overflow, same for spelling checking :-D
> They
> have no downsides I can possibly think of
Some people never use them, and hence they use memory and add risks.
> and have many advantages. They
> are useful. HTML on Usenet is not.
Of course can HTML be useful on Usenet. The problem is that it will be much
more often abused instead of used.
--
John Small Perl scripts: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Perl programmer available: http://castleamber.com/
Happy Customers: http://castleamber.com/testimonials.html
More information about the Python-list
mailing list