pre-PEP: Simple Thunks
Kay Schluehr
kay.schluehr at gmx.net
Sat Apr 16 11:07:16 EDT 2005
Brian Sabbey wrote:
> def get_items(thunk): # <-- "thunk-accepting function"
> f = acquire()
> try:
> for i in f:
> thunk(i) # A-OK
> finally:
> f.release()
>
> do i in get_items():
> print i
Seems like You want to solve the addressed generator problem by
manipulating the syntax: "make generators look more function like",
because father compiler won't complain ;-) Sorry, but IMO this is
hackery and has nothing to do with good language design and I consider
this as extremely harmfull. Instead of making things explicit it does
it the other way round and tries to make Python code more obscure.
Moreover I can't notice the superiority of thunks in Your other
examples over more common techniques like decorators for pre- and
postconditions and the GOF command pattern. I thinks the place for such
ideas are Michael Hudsons famous bytecodehacks.
-1 for from me for thunks in Python.
Ciao,
Kay
More information about the Python-list
mailing list