MS SQL Server/ODBC package for Python
Peter Herndon
tpherndon at gmail.com
Fri Apr 15 18:20:43 EDT 2005
Marc-Andre, I apologize for knocking against something that is part of
your livelihood, I hadn't thought about that aspect before I posted.
In my experience though, adodbapi was much faster. However, I have
done no benchmarks, my situation is likely pathological, and I
wouldn't be able to build objective benchmarks anyway, so take it with
a huge grain of salt.
For what it is worth, my experience is as follows: Using a PIII
550MHz, 256MB RAM, running WinNT 4.0 and Python 2.3.4 and connecting
to a Sybase Adaptive Server Anywhere 8.0 database, mx.ODBC took
approximately 8 wall-clock seconds to connect, while adodbapi took
about 2 seconds to connect. That timing is a guesstimate on my part,
based on me counting. The only thing changed in the script was the
driver import and the connect string. Likewise, a query that would
need to search a table with a full data scan on the columns in the
where clause (vendor doesn't believe in indexes), where the table has
20k - 30k rows, takes 30-60 seconds using mx.ODBC versus 15-30 seconds
using adodbapi.
A different application, connecting to MSSQL2K, also exhibited similar
tendencies. mx.ODBC took a bit longer to connect than adodbapi,
though the differences were *much* smaller. Not measurable by
guesstimation, but a tad longer.
Again, this is just my experience, and my situation is not likely to
match others'. Given other circumstances, I would expect the results
to differ, and I encourage the original poster to test all possible
solutions to find the one that best fits his needs.
---Peter Herndon
On 4/15/05, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
> Peter Herndon wrote:
> > Another option is adodbapi, which in my experience is much faster than
> > mx.ODBC.
>
> Much faster ?
>
> See http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/technologies/iis/reskit/iischp7.mspx
> and scroll down to Table 7.1:
>
> Table 7.1 TPS (transactions per second) Per Number of Threads by MDAC Technology
> Threads 1 2 5 10 20 50
> ODBC 66.37 146.28 350.46 626.76 900.24 859.91
> OLEDB 67.30 141.92 326.19 590.57 794.91 715.78
> OLEDB 2.0 61.73 126.93 297.29 506.75 575.35 526.61
> ADO 2.0 51.24 108.12 240.91 377.30 361.26 310.34
>
> > You can find it at http://adodbapi.sourceforge.net , and it
> > is Windows-only. There's also http://pymssql.sourceforge.net, which is
> > cross-platform using FreeTDS and unixodbc on *nix. I haven't any
> > experience with it, though.
>
> --
> Marc-Andre Lemburg
> eGenix.com
>
> Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Apr 15 2005)
> >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
> >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
> >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> ::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
>
More information about the Python-list
mailing list