Xah Lee's Unixism
David Schwartz
davids at webmaster.com
Fri Sep 3 21:12:49 EDT 2004
"Anne & Lynn Wheeler" <lynn at garlic.com> wrote in message
news:u8ybrrzqd.fsf at mail.comcast.net...
> at the time of the 1st disaster ... the claim was that the utah bid
> was the only solution that required manufactoring the boosters in
> sections for transportion and the subsequent re-assembly in florida
> with gaskets. the assertion was that none of the other solutions could
> have had a failure because of gaskets ... because they didn't have
> gaskets (having been manufactored as a single unit).
>
> so the failure cause scenario went (compared to solutions that didn't
> require gaskets and manufactoring in sections)
>
> disaster because of inferior(?) gaskets
> inferior(?) gaskets because of gaskets
> gaskets because of transportion sectioning requirement
> transportation sectioning requirement because the sections
> were manufactored in utah
True, but totally irrelevent. Had they gone with any other design, they
could not have had a disaster due to any defect in the design they wouldn't
have chosen.
DS
More information about the Python-list
mailing list