GPL and Python modules.
Steve Holden
steve at holdenweb.com
Mon Oct 25 19:43:55 EDT 2004
Peter Otten wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>
>>I don't really want to have to come to individual agreements
>>with 5-10 different module authors. That's why "standard"
>>licenses were invented.
>
>
> Yes, and for an author to GPL a module is the standard way of saying use it
> as you like in your program, but distribute your part of the work under the
> same terms. Basically an embrace-and-extend antidote for code.
>
> I think talking to an author and maybe offering a moderate fee if you want
> terms more favourable to your purpose shouldn't be too much.
>
> Otherwise you have to stick to modules with BSD/MIT/Python Licenses - not
> that rare in Python land.
>
Looks that way. Time was, authors would use the LGPL for libraries
(which was why it was developed in the first place). But if someone puts
a module under the GPL then any integrated use of that module is a
dervied work and must, if redistributed, be put out under the GPL.
regards
Steve
--
http://www.holdenweb.com
http://pydish.holdenweb.com
Holden Web LLC +1 800 494 3119
More information about the Python-list
mailing list