Suggestions for Python workshop

[Fernando Perez]

Cameron Laird wrote:

> I have strong feelings on this subject, only a fraction of which
> I'll be able to articulate this week.
> 
> First, follow everything Fernando says; he's doing great work.

Thanks :) (blushes)

> Second, I see a variety of approaches to Python-for-scientists,
> and I hope you're able to end up with a Pythonic one.  There's
> low-level how-to-ing:  "this is an implementation of a
> Rayleigh-Ritz algorithm for PDE solution; you can use this in
> hydrodynamics to ..."  What *really* gets interesting, though,
> are comparing Python to other vehicles--Matlab, C++, Fortran--
> and, if you're really good, opening the audience's eyes to the
> potential of a language which facilitates comprehension, collabor-
> ation, and experimentation.  Most scientific listeners won't
> understand abstraction as it applies to software.  Python-for-
> scientists represents a great opportunity.

Well, that's exactly the credo I've been trying to preach to all who are willing
to listen over the last couple of years.  I think I've made progress, at least
by converting some people around me to these tools.  But I'm quite interested
in your opinion on the matter.

<blatant plug ahead>

If anyone from the Colorado Front Range area is interested on this subject, I'm
scheduled to give the colloquium at the Mathematics and computer science
department of the Colorado School of Mines in Golden, on Friday Nov. 19th (3pm)
on this very topic.  I hope to do justice to python's qualities for scientific
work, but ideas from the c.l.py community are very welcome (I haven't written
the talk yet, so there's time to put it in).

Cheers,

f