Style question on recursive generators
Carlos Ribeiro
carribeiro at gmail.com
Tue Oct 19 10:34:52 EDT 2004
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:23:37 +0000, Dima Dorfman
<d+pylist at nospamplease.trit.org> wrote:
> Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > If the issue is strictly one of whether it's worth somehow making
> > for x in y: yield x
> > terser (by a new kw, combination of kw, and/or punctuation) I guess we
> > can discuss that (I just don't see the gain to offset the price of
> > introducing new syntax and one more language thing to learn for
> > Pythonistas and newcomers to Python).
>
> I find myself writing a lot of recursive generators, and a while ago I
> implemented this:
>
> yield *other
>
> to mean:
>
> for x in other:
> yield x
Just a clarification. You _implemented_ it as a patch to Python, or
using some clever trick that I'm not aware of? Or did you just write a
specification?
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: carribeiro at gmail.com
mail: carribeiro at yahoo.com
More information about the Python-list
mailing list