Rationals?

[Mike Meyer]

Nick Craig-Wood <nick at craig-wood.com> writes:

> Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  If you want to use rationals in Python, gmpy is a fine way to do it
>>  today.
>
> I would say gmpy (or something like it, eg mxNumber) should be added
> to the standard library.
>
> I'm personally more interested in the fixed point numbers rather than
> the rationals, and having played with various implementations of that
> concept recently, I can say that the new decimal module is by far the
> slowest, and gmpy is by far the fastest.
>
> Eg simplistic program to calculate 1000 decimal places of e :-
>
> gmpy.mpf            0.00271s
> FixedPointNcw.py    0.0118s (FixedPoint.py with simple mod for * by int)
> FixedPoint.py       0.358s
> decimal          1546.9s
>
> People are going to come new to Python and see the decimal type and
> think - oh this looks ideal for high precision calculations, then get
> rather a shock!

Possibly the documentation for the decimal modules (and any rational
module) should mention this, and provide a pointer to gmpy?

        <mike
-- 
Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org>			http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.