Prothon gets Major Facelift in Vers 0.1.0 [Prothon]

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Ryan Paul wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2004 22:53:01 -0700, simo wrote:
> 
> 
(snip)
>>Proper encapsulation is needed before the C++ brigade will take
>>P[y/ro]thon seriously as an OO language, oh and a machinecode compiler
>>;-)
> 
> 
(snip)

> I dont understand why everybody seems to want a machinecode compiler. It
> wont make a high-level, dynamically typed language run any faster.

Err... You might want to check some Common Lisp implementations.

> --SegPhault
> 
Note that here it should read 'sigfault' !-)

Bruno