terminological obscurity

[Arthur]

On Fri, 28 May 2004 00:37:39 GMT, Arthur <ajsiegel at optonline.com>
wrote:

>Yet you insist, with a fresh start on all this, on using the
>terminology "homogenous data".

I only see 3 possibilities:

1.  You are going further than Donn and Michael Chermside, who
maintained that Guido meant exactly what should be meant, but didn't
express it well.  Are you saying that Guido meant exactly what should
be meant, and expressed it as it should be expressedl - and that Donn
and Michael are also missing something (perhaps more subtle than what
I am missing)?

2. You are using the same terminology, now in a different sense.

3. You are expressing some sense that this issue as to terminology
doesn't interest you - as long as you and Guido know what you and
Guido mean.

Art