bug in inspect (was cgitb vs traceback)

[Robin Becker]

Robin Becker wrote:

.....
> 
> No I'll mosy on over and see if it's known. I have a fix in place in our 
> code, but we had to modify it yesterday as we're delivering for 2.1.

I didn't find anything similar there so I submitted a bug report and the 
patch I used. I think it's far too late for 2.3.4.

As to whether this problem occurs in 2.1 I'm not sure. I know we fixed 
the fix in our 2.1 tests as it had a // operator in the code and that 
won't work in 2.1. I'm not sure whether it works though as we need it 
only with cgitb and I'm not sure that's even present in 2.1.
-- 
Robin Becker