terminological obscurity
Arthur
ajsiegel at optonline.com
Fri May 28 19:40:58 EDT 2004
On Fri, 28 May 2004 22:12:03 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis"
<martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>Arthur wrote:
>> Is the random set of, say, 10 human beings homogeonous or
>> hetereogenous?
>
>If they are random, than yes, they are homogenous as they are
>all human, and no, the are heterogenous, because they are
>random, i.e. they share no features.
But then nothing can be determined about the hetergenousity or the
homogenousity of any particular context for this data by reference to
the data itself.
Though the reverse is not true.
In the conversation I am having this is a significant point.
But I suspect we are not having the same conversation.
Art
More information about the Python-list
mailing list