Voting (was Re: PEP 318

[AdSR]

Ville Vainio <ville at spammers.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I prefer 
> 
> def f(x,y) [wrapper,wrapper...]:
>         pass
> 
> or
> 
> def f(x,y) as iterable:
>         pass
> 
> and would oppose
> 
> def f [wrapper, wrapper...] (x,y):
>         pass
> 
> Like others, I want to see the param list right next to the function
> name.

I like the "as iterable" form much better than any other. The "as"
word says immediately what it means.

Also, since in some situations tuples are written without parens ("a,
b, c = three_elem_tuple"), you could allow for:

def f(x, y) as decor1, decor2, decor3:
    pass

Cheers,

AdSR