Prothon Prototypes vs Python Classes

[John Roth]

"Mark Hahn" <mark at prothon.org> wrote in message
news:AHF9c.49048$cx5.33872 at fed1read04...
> I didn't know I was going the opposite direction from Python. I guess I'll
> have to change that.
>
> I guess I didn't make it clear that no design decisions were frozen in the
> language.
>
> Mark Hahn (Prothon Author)

Thank you. That wasn't the impression I had picked up from
the third party discussion of the issue earlier.

John Roth

>
> "John Roth" <newsgroups at jhrothjr.com> wrote in message
> news:106di86neu1qh4d at news.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Mark Hahn" <mark at prothon.org> wrote in message
> > news:v0r9c.38988$cx5.22021 at fed1read04...
> > > > although for reasons I've mentioned elsewhere, I won't use Prothon.
> > >
> > > Can you please point me to those reasons?
> >
> > Since I got into a minor flame war over them, including a
> > very snide and oh so superior response from one yahoo
> > who almost hit my killfile over it, I'll just mention that there
> > are ***very good***, that is ***extremely good***
> > reasons why the Python standard is to use spaces for
> > indentation, and why the option of using tabs will be
> > removed in 3.0.
> >
> > There are enough interesting languages out there to
> > investigate that I simply won't bother with candidates
> > that don't play fair with ***all*** the tools I use,
> > or that people I communicate with use.
> >
> > John Roth
> >
> >
> >
>
>