Why static typed languages are sometimes better.
Lothar Scholz
dummy at scriptolutions.com
Thu Jul 1 20:17:37 EDT 2004
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:54:27 -0700, "Wai Yip Tung"
<tungwaiyip at yahoo.com> wrote:
>I agree. I appreciate the dynamic and polymorphic power of Python. On the
>other hand I hope it does a better job to catch my silly mistakes and
>typos. If only there is something like a lint it would save me something
>fixing runtime errors.
There was a lint: PyChecker.
But for unkown reasons it is now dead.
And we still have no tools that makes use of manually added type
declarations.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list