Modifying func_closure
Ville Vainio
ville at spammers.com
Mon Jul 12 11:40:25 EDT 2004
>>>>> "Jacek" == Jacek Generowicz <jacek.generowicz at cern.ch> writes:
Jacek> Ville Vainio <ville at spammers.com> writes:
>> Closures are indeed much handier than classes for many
>> "in-place", lightweight operations. Implementing a local class
>> is often too heavyweight, esp. if the creator has to implement
>> __init__ as well as another method that does useful work.
Jacek> ... which is pretty much guaranteed ... if you didn't have
Jacek> to implement __init__ then it wouldn't be a closure (unless
Jacek> I'm missing some subtle variation on the theme).
Sorry, I meant if have_to_implement (__init__ AND other
method). Sometimes just __init__ will do, if the state is manipulated
directly via attributes.
Jacek> Wow, if I hear any more of these comments, I might just
Jacek> have to start thinking about considering to entertain the
Jacek> possibility of maybe writing a PEP. (Do you note any
Jacek> hesitation or reluctance on my part ? :-)
PEP won't hurt. At least it would be a document about why the feature
was rejected, should such a thing happen ;-).
--
Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
More information about the Python-list
mailing list