Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote: > Damien Wyart wrote: >><http://www.python.org/doc/faq/programming.html#is-there-an-equivalent-of-c-s-ternary-operator> > > Is the reject of this feature final? I mean, is discussion about the > construct obsolete? As the resulting thread is already showing, no, discussion is definitely not obsolete. Pointless, maybe, but not obsolete. ;-) -Peter