Replacement for locals() ???
Christian Tismer
tismer at stackless.com
Fri Jul 30 11:14:55 EDT 2004
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> Harald> I read within psysco-FAQ and Jim Hugoninis IronPython paper: a
> Harald> lot of words about "locals() being very difficult or impossible
> Harald> to optimize"
>
> Harald> AND UNTIL
>
> Harald> so ... is there any convenient replacement? Of course I could do
>
> Harald> {"id":id, "surename":surename} , but that would be very very
> Harald> in-elegant.
>
> That's the only solution I've found so far. Makes for rather ugly code. If
> you have to choose, what do you want, fast or pretty? <wink>
You can have both: fast and pretty.
That's why I got interested in Bytecodehacks:
I can write locals(), but transform that into
the explicit from by introspection, and replace
the function before I use it.
(Haven't written an un-local()iser yet, but it
seems straight forward).
ciao - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list