WaitForMultipleObjects in Python.

[Antoon Pardon]

Op 2004-07-10, Elbert Lev schreef <elbertlev at hotmail.com>:
> David!
>
>> It's close enough for many uses, but not for all.  But I disagree that
>> such a statement must imply a wrong language choice.  Python has a
>> selected set of synchronization primitives and supporting functions.
>> The very fact that there are any in the standard library certainly
>> means, to me, that there can and should be discussions as to whether
>> it has a reasonable set, without having to jump right to "switch
>> languages."
>> 
>
> Python syncro promitives and threading model are the same as in java.
> I'm sure that they are sufficient for creating more powerful objects,

But python only implements a subset of the Java behaviour. So looking 
at Java and deciding those are sufficient, doesn't say much about
python.

-- 
Antoon Pardon