ditto

[wes weston]

Preferably, a program that runs or a screen dump.

Mark McEahern wrote:
> Elaine Jackson wrote:
> 
>> If bool(B_i)==True for 1<=i<=n and j is the smallest i with 
>> bool(A_j)==True,
>> then the evaluation of (A_1 and B_1) or ... or (A_n and B_n) returns 
>> B_j without
>> evaluating any other B_i. This is such a useful mode of expression 
>> that I would
>> like to be able to use something similar even when there is an i with
>> bool(B_i)==False. The only thing I can think of by myself is ( (A_1 
>> and [B_1])
>> or ... or (A_n and [B_n]) )[0], and I can't be satisfied with that for 
>> obvious
>> reasons. Does anybody know a good way to express this? Any help will 
>> be mucho
>> appreciado.
>>
> Why not write a unit test that demonstrates the behavior you want?  
> It'll then likely be obvious to someone both what your problem is and 
> what a likely solution is.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> // m
>