Python/Parrot still alive?
Paul Prescod
paul at prescod.net
Sun Feb 8 03:41:08 EST 2004
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> ...
>
> If you believe that application servers require Parrot because it
> has a virtual machine, you are certainly wrong:
> - Python does have a virtual machine even without Parrot.
> - Applications servers do not fundamentally require virtual
> machines.
It is interesting how interpreters have been rebranded as "virtual
machines." Python people still use the word "interpreter" and that is
probably not great from a marketing point of view.
Paul Prescod
More information about the Python-list
mailing list