decorators ?

[Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy)]

Michael Hudson wrote:

> Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> writes:
> 
>>     Jacek> Anything you can do with decorators, you could do before
>>     (with Jacek> the exception of rebinding the __name__ of
>> functions). 
>> 
>> And while that feature was added because we realized it would be
>> nice if the decorated function could have the same name as the
>> original function, it seems like that change could stand on its own
>> merits. 
> 
> Indeed.  I'd been meaning to do it for at least a year...

Ah - looking for any old excuse to get it in huh? <wink>

Tim Delaney