Why no list heritable type?
Jeff Shannon
jeff at ccvcorp.com
Fri Dec 17 12:46:40 EST 2004
Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
>In article <86vfb13jpl.fsf at guru.mired.org>, Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org> wrote:
>
>
>>And before Python 2.2 there was the UserList class in the standard
>>library. Which is still there in 2.4. Shouldn't it be depreciated by
>>this point?
>>
>>
>
>Apart from compatibility issues as mentioned in the UserList
>documentation, deriving from it will give you a classic class,
>whereas deriving from list will give you a new style class.
>There may be circumstances under which this is important
>(exercise left to more twisted minds than mine). Same applies
>to dict/UserDict.
>
>
Additionally, as I understand it UserList and UserDict are implemented
entirely in Python, which means that there can be significant
performance differences as well. There's very little benefit to
UserList/UserDict now that builtins can be subclassed, and I believe
that they are still there only as a matter of backward compatibility.
Jeff Shannon
Technician/Programmer
Credit International
More information about the Python-list
mailing list