Decorator syntax

[Edward K. Ream]

> Anyway, check the past discussions before going back around
> the same arguments yet again.

And exactly how is one supposed to do this?  I would have thought the pep
would be the place to start, but pep 318 is actively misleading as to the
state of the project.

BTW, one of the design goals in pep 318 is "not needlessly complicate
secondary support tools".  I would classify Leo as one of those tools, and
the '@' syntax threatens Leo directly, as I have said in the thread called
"Confused about pep 318"

Edward
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward K. Ream   email:  edreamleo at charter.net
Leo: Literate Editor with Outlines
Leo: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------