Think you've got a new decorator syntax?

[David Fraser]

Steven Bethard wrote:
> You probably don't. ;)  Here's a script that generates (almost) all of
> the proposals so far.  Don't worry, there's only 1224 that are both
> not currently valid syntax and also easily greppable. ;)
> 
> http://ucsu.colorado.edu/~bethard/py/decorators.py
> 
> And the output (throwing away any syntaxes that were currently valid
> or not easily greppable):
> 
> http://ucsu.colorado.edu/~bethard/py/decorators-output.py
> 
> Steve

Excellent! I propose that we accept *ALL* of the syntaxes! Flexibility!

David