RELEASED Python 2.4, alpha 2

[paolo veronelli]

On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 02:04:34 +1000, Anthony Baxter 
<anthonybaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

>> This is a bad joke after all the strong perplexities showed about its
>> decorators solution.
>> I vote against the "@decorator before function" solution.
>
> Please feel free to actually provide reasons for not liking @decorators.
>
> Also - if you think you don't like it - please _try_ _it_ _out_ first.

My vote which is nothing really important is only for syntax .
1) I don't want strange looking operators:
	This is one why I use python like all: readability.Use a keyword like 
decorated
	(are they decorations or this is an unfortunate word?)
2) I like things in the right places:
	What is doing that thing before the def.
	Def keyword is not only there for the interpreter,is there also for 
me.Eventually how would I change my editor folding engine ???
	Python is nice for tired of uglynesses programmers.I use it for personal 
meditation ,spending a lot of time in making the code
	beautiful 	for my eyes,and when I teach it everybody agrees about the 
thoughts ,hardly asking what's this symbol
	or that construct?

Linearity is a must for human written code,the only thing will make it 
reusable by them.

		

-- 
....lotta dura  per la verdura