CamelCase versus wide_names (Prothon)

[Paul Rubin]

"Mark Hahn" <mark at prothon.org> writes:
> 1) CamelCase is more elegant, modern, more readable, and more efficient in
> character usage.

IfCamelCaseWereReallyMoreReadable, We'dWriteOrdinaryEnglishLikeUsingIt.
SoThatClaimIsRidiculousAndNeedsToBeThrownOutTheWindowPostHaste.

> 2) Wide_names is cleaner, more readable, compatible with C, which is the
> standard module language for Python and Prothon.  Wide_names is also the
> Python standard.

Sounds_ok_with_me.  I_find_it_a_heck_of_a_lot_more_readable_than_camel_case.
I_vote_for_wide_names.